Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

A new rationale for preservation of the mandibular third molar in orthognathic patients with missing molars

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2022³â 48±Ç 1È£ p.63 ~ 67
¹é¿îºÀ, ±èÀ±Áö, äȭ¼º, ¹ÚÀç¾ï, Julian Stefania, ÀÌÀÇ·æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹é¿îºÀ ( Baik Un-Bong ) - Private practice
±èÀ±Áö ( Kim Yoon-Ji ) - Korea University Anam Hospital Department of Orthodontics
äȭ¼º ( Chae Hwa-Sung ) - Ajou University School of Medicine Department of Orthodontics
¹ÚÀç¾ï ( Park Je-Uk ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
 ( Julian Stefania ) - University of Salvador Orthodontics and Maxillary Orthopedics
ÀÌÀÇ·æ ( Lee Ui-Lyong ) - Chung-Ang University Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract


Controversies exist regarding the need for prophylactic extraction of mandibular third molars in patients who plan to undergo orthognathic surgery. An 18-year-old male patient was diagnosed with mandibular prognathism and maxillary retrognathism with mild facial asymmetry. He had a severely damaged mandibular first molar and a horizontally impacted third molar. After extraction of the first molar, the second molar was protracted into the first molar space, and the third molar erupted into the posterior line of occlusion. The orthognathic surgery involved clockwise rotation of the maxil-lomandibular complex as well as angle shaving and chin border trimming. Patients who are missing or have damaged mandibular molars should be monitored for eruption of third molars to replace the missing posterior tooth regardless of the timing of orthognathic surgery.

Å°¿öµå

Orthodontics; Orthognathic surgery; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Temporary anchorage device; Third molar

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed